Review
Landingi is the pick if you publish many campaign pages and you want server-side testing on Optimize, at a lower testing tier than Unbounce Experiment. Leadpages is the better fit for uncapped traffic. A checkout tool is the better fit when you need to accept payments on the page.
Landingi is the pick if you publish many campaign pages and you want server-side testing on a lower tier than Unbounce Experiment. Read the Leadpages review if you need uncapped traffic. Read the ClickFunnels or Kartra review if the page needs to accept credit card payments. Build is the publishing plan. Testing is on Optimize.
See Landingi pricing before you start a trial. Read the Optimize row there. The trial allowance is the figure in the panel above, and it is lower than the first paid tier.
The ads are about to go up, or they already have, and you need a page you can change without a developer. Leadpages and Unbounce are the other two tools on that shortlist. Landingi is the landing page builder that keeps appearing beside them at a lower testing tier.
It is a hosted builder, founded in 2012. The homepage describes a platform for building, testing and managing campaign pages, and the current page leads with an AI landing page builder. Pop-ups and multi-page funnels are part of the same product. They move a visitor from one screen to the next. Payments are handled by a separate checkout tool.
Landingi's product page explains the shared block in one line. You make the change once and publish it on every page. A pricing table, a header, a form. The plan comparison places that block on Optimize, alongside A/B testing. A team running the same offer on several URLs notices the difference right away, because the alternative is pasting the same edit into every page.
Testing is a separate plan from publishing. Optimize adds EventTracker and server-side testing. Build lists active pages and visits. Publish on Build when that is the whole job. Buy Optimize when the test is why you are here.
The price depends on how many pages stay active, and on how many visits those pages get in a month. Both numbers are in the plan table lower on this page. That table shows the annual rates. The Unbounce review and the Leadpages review are the two comparisons readers bring to this decision, one for layout control and one for traffic with no visit cap.
Reviewers praise Smart Sections because one edit updates a pricing block on every page that uses it. A Capterra note calls the same idea a smart collection feature. That works well for a team running several campaigns that share one block.
“smart sections let me reuse a pricing block across many pages and update it in one place”
“smart collection feature”
A G2 review says the pixel-perfect editor often needs the phone layout rebuilt by hand. A PPC commenter who switched from Unbounce says the mobile view makes sense. The two reports describe the same editor, and they disagree.
“Because the editor is pixel perfect, I mean, absolute positioning, the mobile view often requires significant manual rebuilding. It doesn't auto respond as smoothly as grid-based builders. You have to move elements around specifically for the phone view.”
“the mobile view actually makes sense”
PPC threads bring up Landingi after Unbounce price increases. One person on a trial calls it less customizable than Unbounce. Another, who already switched, likes the mobile view.
“the mobile view actually makes sense”
“not quiiiite as customizable”
“Because the editor is pixel perfect, I mean, absolute positioning, the mobile view often requires significant manual rebuilding. It doesn't auto respond as smoothly as grid-based builders. You have to move elements around specifically for the phone view.”
“smart sections let me reuse a pricing block across many pages and update it in one place”
“smart collection feature”
“the mobile view actually makes sense”
“not quiiiite as customizable”
Filip K. on G2 credits the shared block and then faults the phone view in the same review. On the block: smart sections let me reuse a pricing block across many pages and update it in one place
. On the phone: the mobile view often requires significant manual rebuilding
. He ties the second point to absolute positioning. Elements have to be repositioned for the phone, because the editor does not reflow the way a grid builder does.
On r/PPC the reports split. Someone who switched from Unbounce says the mobile view actually makes sense
, in a thread asking for a landing page builder. Another person, still on a trial after an Unbounce price increase, writes that Landingi is not quiiiite as customizable
, in the price-increase thread. One comment is about the phone preview. The other is about how much of the layout you can customize.
The monthly column shows what you pay each month on an annual plan. Yearly billing includes two months free.
| Plan | Monthly | Yearly | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build | $24 | 2 months free | 10 active pages and 2,000 visits a month. Publishing plan. |
| Optimize | $119 | 2 months free | 100 active pages, 30,000 visits, EventTracker and server-side A/B tests. |
| Scale | From $229 | 2 months free | 100,000 to 500,000 visits, programmatic pages and client subaccounts. |
| Enterprise | From $1,199 | 2 months free | 1 million visits and up, with higher domain and user limits. |
An extra custom domain is $5 a month, on top of the plan.
Unbounce lists Experiment, the plan where its A/B tests start, at $149 a month, or $112 a month billed annually, with a 30,000-visitor tier. The cards are on Unbounce's pricing page and on our Unbounce plan grid. Leadpages advertises unlimited traffic on all plans, and manual A/B tests start on Grow. Those figures are on Leadpages pricing.
The same grid, with the upgrade notes written out, is on the Landingi pricing page.
A media buyer with several offers, each on its own URL, is the clearest fit. The shared block keeps the offer consistent, and Optimize is where the variant test runs on the server. That buyer already has email and a cart somewhere else. They came here for the page and the test.
A single quiet lead page belongs on Build only when the page count and the traffic both fit that tier, and you are not testing. Paying for the testing tier only to publish one page is hard to justify. The limits decide it.
An agency that needs a login per client should look at Scale. Programmatic pages and subaccounts are on that tier. A freelancer publishing inside one brand account can skip it.
If a busy month would blow past the visit allowance, look at Leadpages. Every Leadpages plan advertises unlimited traffic. Testing there starts on Grow, as a manual A/B test, which works differently from server-side testing on Optimize. The Leadpages review covers the editor and the billing reputation. Leadpages vs Unbounce is the head-to-head when those two are the shortlist and Landingi is the third name.
If your design needs tighter control than Landingi offers, Unbounce is the better choice. Experiment costs more, and the public threads from people leaving it are about that bill. If you are already on Unbounce, start with Unbounce alternatives and the Unbounce review.
Instapage is the other builder that puts server-side testing inside a visitor allowance, and it does not cap the number of pages. The Instapage review breaks down that allowance, including what the help center says happens when an account exceeds it.
If the page needs to accept payments, look at ClickFunnels or Kartra. Both put the checkout in the same account as the page. A Landingi pop-up can still collect an email address. Orders are processed in ClickFunnels or Kartra.
I would use the trial to design the mobile version, because that step is separate from the desktop page. A G2 review says you have to design the mobile layout manually, because the editor uses absolute positioning. The shared block earns its place when it replaces pasting the same offer onto every URL.
The trial limit is lower than the first paid tier, so a full traffic test has to wait for a paid plan. If the mobile layout is the main worry, compare Unbounce Experiment with Optimize before you buy.
5 discussions and reviews read for this page. Quotes are excerpts; open a link to read the original in context.
See Landingi pricing for every annual rate. For other tools to switch to, see Landingi alternatives.
For the wider set, see the best funnel and landing page builders and all reviews. Rankings follow how we rank tools.
Written by
Marta Ovalle
Editor, funnel & checkout tools
Marta Ovalle leads Funnel Critic's coverage of funnel builders and checkout platforms. She reads the long-running threads where operators compare tools after months of live ad spend, cross-checks every claim against the vendor's own docs and pricing pages, and confirms prices with each vendor before a verdict goes live. She writes most of the roundups and pricing pages, and she decides when a ranking changes.
Last checked 2026-10-21
No comments yet. Questions and your own experience are welcome.
Thank you. Your comment will appear once it has been reviewed.